3 ms·
photography is actually a very good example of how this talking point breaks down. there are a great deal of laws and social codes around where you can and cann
by odessacubbage 4y ago
photography is actually a very good example of how this talking point breaks down.
there are a great deal of laws and social codes around where you can and cannot film and take photographs. photography is explicitly disallowed in most museums and art galleries. filming in public requires permits and waivers in many places, especially if the filming is done with a commercial interest.
'but how is capturing an image with a camera lens any different from capturing it with my retina? both are simply methods of refracting light and translating that information into a storage medium. the camera is just remembering* like a human remembers and we mustn't let luddites regulate this revolutionary technology or we'll impede the progress of the camera becoming an even more better rememberer'*
the social ramifications of the camera are still being reckoned with to this day and yes, cameras very highly regulated compared to pretty much any other human method of expression or transcription, in fact we are still coming up with new things you cannot film eg the recent crop of revenge porn laws.
- tester457 4y agoI had the same thoughts. Finally, someone has put into words the logical end of the trite photography analogy. It's a refreshingly sane perspective to see in this thread.