3 ms·
They don’t need to make a claim to historicity in order for me to remark on their ahistoricity. If they don’t claim historical accuracy, then I’m in agreement w
by woodruffw 4y ago
They don’t need to make a claim to historicity in order for me to remark on their ahistoricity. If they don’t claim historical accuracy, then I’m in agreement with them on that point!
One then wonders what “traditional” refers to, of course.
- mantas 4y agoI guess all sides get what „traditional“ refers to. Just like „non-traditional“. While I'd say nowadays such punk wifes technically are non-traditional...
- dragonwriter 4y ago> One then wonders what “traditional” refers to, of course The “tradition” of aspiring to 1950s commercially constructed media images of the lily white, Protestant, working-class but with middle-class wealth, American culture [0], to which modern reactionary white resentment politcs aspires and for which it blames everything not White, not evangelical/fundamentalist, and not similarly reactionary for denying the White working class from being able to fully enjoy the way they did in the 1950s... fictional mass media presentations. [0] ironically, designed specifically to drive consumerism and extract wealth from the White working class.