No, it's still not progressive. There's a difference between accepting trans people as valid. and pushing some 50's-era rhetoric of feminism being subservient s

No, it's still not progressive. There's a difference between accepting trans people as valid. and pushing some 50's-era rhetoric of feminism being subservient slavery to the man of the house. Interesting how the OP is about the whole "tradwife" ideology which is damaging for women[1] and feminism[2], but you turn it into a trans-vs.-cis argument, for no reason whatsoever. The only "clown world" is the one where you think those two entirely disparate topics are comparable. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/jan/27/tradwives-new-trend-submissive-women-dark-heart-history https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/jan/27/tradwives-ne... [2] https://mashable.com/article/tradwife-feminism-tiktok https://mashable.com/article/tradwife-feminism-tiktok