4 ms·
It sounds like nonsense. The most plausible solution would be to provide credit to every single author whose code was used in the original training set; of cour
by Filligree 4y ago
It sounds like nonsense. The most plausible solution would be to provide credit to every single author whose code was used in the original training set; of course, that would run into gigabytes just for the credits.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- varjag 4y agoAnd…? I think my last Xcode update was 20+ Gb.
- Filligree 4y agoPersonally, I don't want minimalistic programs to start taking 20+GB! Xcode's bloat isn't a goal to strive for. If such a giant list of acknowledgements were to be included, would it even help anyone, in any way? It sounds like pure inefficiency.
- logicallee 4y agoBut GPL requires the resulting derivative code to be open-sourced under GPL, not just attributed. So if you did that then copilot could only emit code under a GPL license. Maybe that is okay, but it is not what copilot is trying to do at the moment. (And not everyone wants to open-source all their code under GPL.)