4 ms·
> They are routinely overstepping the bounds of civil behavior, so these institutions need to be burned to the ground - literally if need be. Or you know, work
by ctvo 4y ago
> They are routinely overstepping the bounds of civil behavior, so these institutions need to be burned to the ground - literally if need be.
Or you know, work on changing the civil forfeiture laws and save the libertarian revolt talk for another issue?
- DaniloDias 4y ago[dead]
- voakbasda 4y agoBecause I do not believe for one second that such a policy can be reformed? That our system has reached a stable state of endemic corruption, such that meaningful reform is no longer possible by the soap, ballot, or jury boxes?
- ctvo 4y agoBurning the FBI (literally, of course) to the ground will solve your issues? Aren't you missing the military, congress, the executive branch, ... the rest of the government? Or was it merely the start of your insurrection? Being so flippant about this is how January 6th happened. Your original comment wasn't logical, it was tough person on the internet noise.
- mardifoufs 4y agoSo any country without civil forfeiture is just following libertarian talking points? You realize america is the exception, and not allowing the police to randomly seize property isn't libertarian? It's complete partisan brain rot to defend FBI asset seizure just to own the imaginary libertarians, or because the FBI is on "your side" now. Abolishing the institution that is so eagerly participating in civil forfeiture would be a pretty moderate position outside the US.