3 ms·
My use of the word "immoral" was meant to be within the context of a single society, not with the world at large. My argument is that current US society has cre
by ender7 15y ago
My use of the word "immoral" was meant to be within the context of a single society, not with the world at large. My argument is that current US society has created a de-facto class system where a significant percentage of the population is forced to go to schools that are so bad that they're barely better than not going to school at all. Here, "forced" means that one's parents either can't afford to send you to a good private school or move to a location with good public schools, or is unwilling to do so.
Students at these schools are, through no fault of their own, largely disenfranchised from participating in society in anything but a menial manner. The ideal image of the guy who didn't even go to high school but went on to found a corporate empire is fading - the people who are founding the empires nowadays tend to have had at least a little college schooling, much less a high school diploma.
Meanwhile, the positions of wealth and respect in our society are reserved for the relatively small portion of society who get a good education (exception: professional athletes & music stars). I classify this system as immoral, as it involves one part of a society preying upon another part, and then using its advantage to ensure continued advantage in the future. I would not shed a single tear if such groups lost the economic right to continue doing so.
More practically, however, it's hard to spend any amount of time in an average public high school (yes, there are some very good ones, but I'm talking about the average here) and not come to the conclusion that something is very, very wrong with the education system in this country. The sad fact is that a really bad school can seriously damage the rest of a child's life. Some few might escape the damage and go on to do great things, but most will carry the mark until they die, working in a series of soulless shitty jobs that they neither enjoy nor respect.
- michaelcampbell 15y ago"forced" and "unwilling to do so" seem at odds to me. [edit] I don't get the downvote, but this discussion is getting so emotional for so many, I guess I should have expected it. My point is, I agree with his point, up until he starts redefining words to mean completely opposite what they normally mean. Forced being used to describe "too poor to move" - fine, but being used to describe "don't want to", that's just tailoring language to fit your preconceived notion.