begs the question, cui bono? obviously, the orthodoxy. the author is clear in his example of who cares about the so-called scientific facts: governments and pol

begs the question, cui bono? obviously, the orthodoxy. the author is clear in his example of who cares about the so-called scientific facts: governments and policymaking agencies. from where i sit, it appears we're looking for another weapon in the arsenal to overruling the individual's free will to, importantly, harm themselves against their (and usually our) better judgement. coming off the back of the recent vaccine debacle, it has a certain curiosity to it. if "vaccines help" were a scientific fact, then we'd probably be in the clear to force straighten people's arms and hit several shots into their veins, for their own good.