The article seems light, citing a single article for the outcome but I think what is very interesting about the article itself is that its an article from the G

The article seems light, citing a single article for the outcome but I think what is very interesting about the article itself is that its an article from the Guardian asking "Why has this been allowed?". This I feel is what is problematic. Social media making this kind of statement is usual, but something like Guardian making statements like this continues to reduce the amount of trust we have in supposedly high quality media like Guardian. Personally, I am interested in more media that I can trust to say/report the right thing. And I am still searching.