3 ms·
Its even less meaningful in this particular case as the M1 has a working temperature of ~100°C, whereas the intel targets ~65°C. Nonetheless, the M1 will most
by 411111111111111 4y ago
Its even less meaningful in this particular case as the M1 has a working temperature of ~100°C, whereas the intel targets ~65°C.
Nonetheless, the M1 will most definitely be drawing much less power, its essentially an Atom processor after all. Its just gonna be hard to really put a number on it - even if you could read out the consumption from the BIOS, as they're doing things differently (integrated GPU and SSD controller for the apple silicone chips etc)
- dijit 4y ago> intel targets ~65°C are you certain you arent swapping these? Intel CPUs are famously running up to 100C before stopping their boost clock. One need only watch a single episode of Linus Tech Tips. people have reported barely any cooling requirements on the M1 and M2s comparitively.
- 411111111111111 4y agoYes, i'm sure. It would've taken you about 20 seconds to find it out yourself too, as the Intel 3770K has a published spreadsheet which clearly states the working temperature. The M1 doesn't, but there are enough unofficial sources to confirm the 100°C too. Including LTTs own video. Its a quiet old model, and consumer CPUs of that generation where generally targeting ~60-70°C. Nowadays they're all going for 95-100°C, wherever its Intel, AMD or Apple
- brigade 4y agoTcase is different than Tjunction. Tjunction has been around 100 since like Yonah at least.
- 411111111111111 4y agoBoth of your statements are true, but Tjunction isn't the target operating temperature. Tjunction is the maximum operating temperature after which damage of the chip becomes likely.
- brigade 4y agoIntel doesn't publish or even have a "target operating temperature" or "working temperature"; I have no clue what you're pulling that out of.