> referring to them as "fanatics" You put that word in quotes implying it was a literal quote. It isn't and the distinction here is actually important. She sa

> referring to them as "fanatics" You put that word in quotes implying it was a literal quote. It isn't and the distinction here is actually important. She said "get them away from fanaticism" - there's a big difference in tone and it hits an important issue. Calling someone a "fanatic" in many ways carries an implication that they have some unchangeable inner nature. They are to be dismissed, ignored. They are beyond reason. She is saying the opposite - that they should be engaged with - that there's a chance that they can be reasoned with. Arguably she is being disingenuous but that's a different discussion. Why did you choose to alter the wording in such a way?