2 ms·
> That's not a fact. It may well be a fact. But it's a fact about the Tarot cards, not the professor. I don't think the case would be materially different if t
by dmurray 4y ago
> That's not a fact.
It may well be a fact. But it's a fact about the Tarot cards, not the professor. I don't think the case would be materially different if the cards required less interpretation, e.g. if she had instead consulted a Magic 8-ball which told her the professor was the murderer "without a doubt".
- tptacek 4y agoYes! But if you could show she consulted the Magic 8-ball and it said "Better not tell you now" and she lied and said "It is decidedly so", you might could actually sue for defamation, which is wild.