3 ms·
> the site owner deliberately accepts that some small percentage of users won't be able to access the site I disagree with this because I don't think those s
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
> the site owner deliberately accepts that some small percentage of
users won't be able to access the site
I disagree with this because I don't think those site owners are
fully informed.
So far, arguments for Cloudflare paint its users as helpless and
clueless. Simultaneously they are fully cognisant of the complexities
and consequences.
I rather think they see a tick-box on a webmin form that says "Block
Evil Hackers", and never give it a second thought.
But you raise a good point. Perhaps Cloudflare are primarily guilty of
misrepresenting their product.