3 ms·

Like a lot of Twitter this days. Fact Threads or controversial opinions looking for engagement to sell something.

• version_five 4y ago
  That's what rubs me the wrong way I think, there is something off about a post like that, it just feels like bad faith "content" rather than an actual helpful write up about something, and I feel like more of this is ruining the internet. It's the equivalent of a more sophisticated listicle.
  • pyth0 4y ago
    Your criticism feels entirely non-substantive. Of course it's lacking depth as its target audience is not historians. Maybe your issue is with the overall trend of "pop journalism" that puts out short, easy to ingest but ultimately reductive content (I think of outlets like Vox on YouTube). I personally think as long as it's not outright lying about the subject, exposing it to more people is better than gatekeeping it for academia. Plus I found the read fairly interesting.
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]