3 ms·

Thanks! In my brain it was always "TeXmacs is for TeX what LyX is for LaTeX". That actually makes me much more interested in TeXmacs, since an independent impl

by sho_hn 4y ago

Thanks! In my brain it was always "TeXmacs is for TeX what LyX is for LaTeX". That actually makes me much more interested in TeXmacs, since an independent implementation puts it at the same level as something like SILE (with a very different user interface story, of course). Now I'm quite curious to check it out to see what kind of quality I could get out of it. Looks like the naming is a topic for discussion in the community: http://forum.texmacs.cn/t/why-some-people-get-upset-when-they-find-out-what-texmacs-really-is/802 http://forum.texmacs.cn/t/why-some-people-get-upset-when-the...

mgubi 4y ago
TeXmacs is more mature than SILE, or any other recent attempt to alternative typesetting engine. It exists since the '90 while SILE seems to be around since 2015. And TeXmacs is a complex and complete piece of software which includes a document format, a typesetting engine, conversion engines from and to various formats, user interface, a graphics editor (https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1607316217206898688 https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1607316217206898688), a plugin system to interface with other softwares. All this is written in a mix of C++ and Scheme, extensible in Scheme and the typesetting engine comes with a proper macro language with first class macros (i.e. macros can be arguments to other macros). Moreover TeXmacs has other subsystem like a parser for mathematical formulas which can assign semantic meaning to user input (e.g. the "-" in "-1" is different from the minus in "1 - 2") and a subsystem which generates mathematical glyphs to complete usual fonts for their use in mathematical typesetting (https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1606953318118756354 https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1606953318118756354).
- sho_hn 4y ago
  That font emulation implementation is pretty wild, thanks: https://www.texmacs.org/joris/fontart/fontart.html#poor-man-sec https://www.texmacs.org/joris/fontart/fontart.html#poor-man-...

by sho_hn 4y ago

mgubi 4y ago

TeXmacs is more mature than SILE, or any other recent attempt to alternative typesetting engine. It exists since the '90 while SILE seems to be around since 2015. And TeXmacs is a complex and complete piece of software which includes a document format, a typesetting engine, conversion engines from and to various formats, user interface, a graphics editor (https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1607316217206898688 https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1607316217206898688), a plugin system to interface with other softwares. All this is written in a mix of C++ and Scheme, extensible in Scheme and the typesetting engine comes with a proper macro language with first class macros (i.e. macros can be arguments to other macros). Moreover TeXmacs has other subsystem like a parser for mathematical formulas which can assign semantic meaning to user input (e.g. the "-" in "-1" is different from the minus in "1 - 2") and a subsystem which generates mathematical glyphs to complete usual fonts for their use in mathematical typesetting (https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1606953318118756354 https://twitter.com/gnu_texmacs/status/1606953318118756354).

sho_hn 4y ago
That font emulation implementation is pretty wild, thanks: https://www.texmacs.org/joris/fontart/fontart.html#poor-man-sec https://www.texmacs.org/joris/fontart/fontart.html#poor-man-...