ah, righto. thanks for specific case history example. and indeed i'm glad of this. It's weird in this case because it's not Mozilla itself that was requiring

ah, righto. thanks for specific case history example. and indeed i'm glad of this. It's weird in this case because it's not Mozilla itself that was requiring Mozilla in the user-agent string for a site to allow or support the browser, but third-parties, who Mozilla didn't encourage or particularly want to do that, as far as I know. But it's still probably true that it would not be enforceable under trademark for this and other reasons, okay. I wonder if Firefox has ever considered taking "Mozilla" _out_ of their user-agent! At this point it's probably impossible. We're just stuck with this mess.