3 ms·
You're right. That does not make the absurd claims about that site being 20k year old any less absurd though. > Younger Dryas Impact Is a hypothesis a not som
by qwytw 4y ago
You're right. That does not make the absurd claims about that site being 20k year old any less absurd though.
> Younger Dryas Impact
Is a hypothesis a not somehow proven fact. Barely even a theory.
- moloch-hai 4y agoAs of 2019 it is fact. You would need to come up with something else to account for all the evidence. The only remotely plausible alternative would be volcanism, but without sulfur.