3 ms·
I personally wouldn't have a problem living in a city like SF if crime and homeless were less common But since this is a literal nightmare in SF, being less "c
by spritefs 4y ago
I personally wouldn't have a problem living in a city like SF if crime and homeless were less common
But since this is a literal nightmare in SF, being less "car dependent" or appeasing these whining activists is the least of my concern.
I could give a shit less about "car dependency" if I have to worry about my own personal safety on a regular basis. Expecting people to put their own personal safety on the line to reduce "car dependency" is asinine. If city advocates want people to move to their cities, they should get their shit in check first before even bothering to ask
- fundad 4y agoMost people in SF have cars, most streets are lined with garage doors. There are many without cars but the city is designed for cars. If you’re ok with car dependency then the suburbs are more comfortable. If shopping and hooking-up aren’t as important than safety you are winning.
- spritefs 4y ago> Most people in SF have cars, most streets are lined with garage doors. Ok. But what about cars getting broken into? Isn't that incredibly common? If I hypothetically lived in SF, I definitely wouldn't bring a car just bc I don't want my catalytic converter getting stolen or the windows getting broken
- fundad 4y agoWho parks on the street? The car is for driving to Tahoe. They ride Uber within the city.