4 ms·
> Sure it is: an appeal to authority is not a valid step in a deductive logical argument Technically, unless you reinvented logic on your own, this in an argum
by shakow 4y ago
> Sure it is: an appeal to authority is not a valid step in a deductive logical argument
Technically, unless you reinvented logic on your own, this in an argument of authority with extra steps.
- zopa 4y agoIf we're talking about fallacies, we're invoking old-fashioned classical logic. The nice thing about having a notion of strict deductive reasoning is that it gives you an idea of what arguments might persuade someone of basic good faith, but who very much doesn't want to be persuaded. If you and your interlocutor don't both accept modus ponens then you won't get anywhere, but that's pretty unlikely in practice. (And I'd actually argue that we each invent logic on our own and then notice that the logics are equivalent, but that's straying into metaphysics.)