3 ms·
You can always self-host BitWarden! NB: Not affiliated with the company, just a very happy customer.
by PartiallyTyped 4y ago
You can always self-host BitWarden!
NB: Not affiliated with the company, just a very happy customer.
- Havoc 4y agoYeah, trying to decide between bitwarden, vaultwarden and a sync'd KeePassXC implementation. My LP password is thankfully on the stronger side of things so hoping I've got time to try them all
- michaelcampbell 4y agoFWIW, I've used Keepass format for years. Different clients, different syncing mechanisms, but currently on KeepassXC + Syncthing.
- kivle 4y agoI was self-hosting bitwarden-rs (alternative implementation in Rust) in a Docker container, and I had set up Watchtower to automatically update it nightly. I thought I would be relatively safe and keep up with updates. Well, it turns out the project in question had to change their name from bitwarden-rs to vaultwarden-rs since they violated the trademark. Updates stopped being pushed to the original docker image url, and several months passed until I suddenly noticed this. In the meantime I could easily have missed some important security upgrades. I understand it's only myself at fault here, but it made me migrate to a hosted account instead. As fun as it is to self host things, something this security critical is probably better left to dedicated people.