4 ms·
Okay, that's twice you've taken the easy response and ignored the actual meat of critique. I think that's indicator enough that you're unserious.
by pwinnski 4y ago
Okay, that's twice you've taken the easy response and ignored the actual meat of critique. I think that's indicator enough that you're unserious.
- WalterBright 4y agoYour addition of "all" was the meat of your critique. It's a rhetorical device, meant to be argumentative, not substantive. "which might or might not be true" is yet another variation of the same rhetorical argumentative trick.