3 ms·
Being arm is also an issue, as well as being Linux when you need to simulate windows specific stuff. Rpi with keyboard and case is not cheaper than even a not s
by _8j50 4y ago
Being arm is also an issue, as well as being Linux when you need to simulate windows specific stuff. Rpi with keyboard and case is not cheaper than even a not so vintage low end laptop (3-6yo).
Can you even run gns3 on a rpi? This is especially interesting when dealing with NACs and wireless clients (eap-*,.1x,client identification). Linux works too well sometimes in a lab, it will hapilly route traffic or have a trunk interface, the hostility of windows makes it a better (or rather required) lab client especially since you can just bridge linux VMs in my opinion.
- IIsi50MHz 4y agoI've seen Windows IoT running on RPi 3B…and the lags is…significant. As is the fact that it was done so that so that a C/C++ program could receive input from a touchscreen and an HID-emulator device, submit it to a database, and inspect the result. I would have expected a much more perfomant environment, that doesn't miss "keystrokes" and touches, and doesn't feel like I'm literally round-tripping the signal between Earth and Moon.