I am sorry, but you seem to not understand key points of what I am saying, or appear to be deliberately ignoring them, and/or things said previously. So I have

I am sorry, but you seem to not understand key points of what I am saying, or appear to be deliberately ignoring them, and/or things said previously. So I have to conclude this conversation, as you have all the answers you demand above. For instance: > Why are these people refusing to comply to something so unimportant? > I'm confused how the pencil hypothetical is related. Here's the answer. Connect the dots. > The terminology has a reason. > The problem is to be triggered by etymology. Here's the answer. > There doesn't appear to be any principle behind not moving the pencil or not going along with terminology changes. > There are more important things to spend any kind of effort than to please someone who's (demands are unimportant). Here's the answer. > Life is about other people too. Not just ourselves. You have a small minor issue while others have actual grievances. > When performed by a mob, it is a DDoS attack, and the reason to not comply with it is the same reason people block sources of the DDoS attacks. Here's one answer. > I never said it is unimportant. It is very important for my workflow to be consistent over time for efficiency. Here's the other. > How is using main instead of master ruining your efficiency? > very important for my workflow to be consistent over time for efficiency. Here's the answer.