4 ms·
US copyrights at the time these Holmes stories were published were good for 2 28-year terms, with a required renewal to get the second one. The Copyright Act of
by zerocrates 4y ago
US copyrights at the time these Holmes stories were published were good for 2 28-year terms, with a required renewal to get the second one. The Copyright Act of 1976 changed the term to "life of the author plus 50 years," but only for works created in 1978 or later. For works from before 1978 still in copyright under the old system, it extended the renewal term's length by 19 years for a new total of 75 years.
The US thereafter had no works enter the public domain until 1998, with the oldest works that were still covered at the '76 Act's date of effectiveness (those from 1922) having finally expired 20 years later (copyrights always run through the end of the calendar year they expire in).
Later that year, Congress tacked another 20 years onto all future and still-active existing copyrights with the Copyright Term Extension Act, so the public domain "paused" again until 2019, when works from 1923 entered the public domain. There have been no more extensions, so the following years have continued moving forward with successive years' works losing copyright protection. In 2023 the relevant year will be 1927.
The final Holmes stories at issue here are from 1927, and so will be public-domain on January 1. It will be quite some time before anything under the "life of the author" regime in the US will fall into the public domain: authors who published works and then also died in 1978 would have the soonest expiration, in 2049.
- kmeisthax 4y agoGotcha. So America's attempt at reconciling the Berne Convention and pre-1973 law gave Arthur Conan Doyle extra copyright years that didn't apply in the EU or UK. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if the expiration pause triggered by the 1976 act winds up being longer and more intolerable than the Berne or EUCD/SBCTEA[0] pauses. There's a lot of 1978 artists still alive today, after all. And of course, if anyone ever figures out aging reversal and functional immortality, then we also get perpetual copyright. (Who the fuck thought life terms were a good idea?) [0] More derisively known as the Mickey Mouse Protection Act
- zerocrates 4y agoOh yeah, once we're into life of the author territory it becomes much more unpredictable when things will actually go out of copyright. And in 2049 and forward for many years, you'll have a mixture each year of older 95-year expirations and newer life+70 ones... it's a mess.