> This implies that things that aren't virtual currencies can still be a "representation of value". Of course, for example: stocks/bonds. > How are they not?

> This implies that things that aren't virtual currencies can still be a "representation of value". Of course, for example: stocks/bonds. > How are they not? Certainly under the plain face meanings of those words they are. There's a reason we call them "currencies". They only have value in the video game world of Fortnite, not the real world. Nobody accepts V-Bucks for payment of goods/services.