4 ms·
you don’t need 3K+ employees to keep the site running. i was at google and a service you probably use everyday if you have android was being supported by 3 peo
by birdymcbird 4y ago
you don’t need 3K+ employees to keep the site running.
i was at google and a service you probably use everyday if you have android was being supported by 3 people.
not defending elon but the company was bleeding money on edge of bankruptcy. feels like entitlement to me to give fake jobs to thousands of people who don’t produce value.
- dopamean 4y agoI keep seeing people say it was in the edge of bankruptcy. If that's true why did Musk pay 44 billion dollars for it?
- KerrAvon 4y agoThey keep getting old Twitter confused with Elon’s Twitter, which he’s saddled with billions in LBO debt. Leveraged buyouts should be illegal.
- lovich 4y agoWithout knowing a single bit about Twitter's finances pre Elon, I can say that's not a convincing argument. He entered into a deal for a specific price and waived his right to back out of it after due diligence. He only bought it because he was about to be forced to purchase it by a court.
- rconti 4y agoYou’d be shocked to learn how many coworkers you had at Google, I’m sure….