Isn't this about the third time Intel has gone gung-ho for "serious graphics" and given up? Intel, your company basically exists to sell useful transistor real

Isn't this about the third time Intel has gone gung-ho for "serious graphics" and given up? Intel, your company basically exists to sell useful transistor real estate. If you look at the number of transistors in a graphics card vs a CPU, the graphics card has WAY MORE. Intel's inabilty to do graphics has always been the canary in the coal mine for their technical competence. Then again a graphics card is basically a VLIW chip if you squint hard enough, and ... Yeah, I guess it started with Itanium, so is it like four times they've failed at this?