>Twitter isn’t law enforcement so, no, there isn’t a requirement that they provide free hosting and promotion for everyone alleging a crime I didn't say they s

>Twitter isn’t law enforcement so, no, there isn’t a requirement that they provide free hosting and promotion for everyone alleging a crime I didn't say they should be required to. I just think they should be consistent on their enforcement of the rules. >In this case, they briefly used their hacked materials policy until deciding that it didn’t apply to the news coverage Why didn't they do that when GiveSendGo was hacked (the hacking was not in doubt) and names of people who donated to the Freedom Convoy were leaked? Like I said, I have an issue with the selective enforcement of the rules. If they want to ban material that is hacked that is fine, but to not do it when everybody knows the materials were hacked is ridiculous. >but did continue to yank non-consensual nudes under their existing policies. I am fine with suppressing non consensual nudes. I am not OK with suppressing articles about them. >If you genuinely believed that Hunter Biden had child porn or whatever Giuliani imagines, you’d definitely want that offline since there’s no public benefit to circulating criminal materials and law enforcement is definitely going to investigate it. No one was suggesting they should be releasing the child porn. I am advocating for allow news articles about it.