4 ms·
No, not irrelevant, unless "free" users also cost you nothing.
by easp 15y ago
No, not irrelevant, unless "free" users also cost you nothing.
- pg 15y agoThey don't have to cost you nothing, just little enough that you're net ahead. And since startups that use the freemium model invariably manage to make free accounts cheap, I assumed I didn't have to mention that explicitly.
- ryanwaggoner 15y agoBut isn't the percentage of users who pay what determines whether you're net ahead, and not the total number of paying users [1]? If Dropbox has ten million users paying them $10 / month, but they have to support another billion free users for twenty cents per month each, they're screwed. 1. Assuming you're making enough to cover fixed expenses
- extension 15y agoprofit = paying users * price per user - total users * expense per user - overhead expenses Business on the internet seems to be much more about driving up total users while driving down expense per user, rather than driving up paying users / total users.
- pg 15y agoNot in practice. Usually startups arrange that the incremental cost of one additional free user decreases as the number of free users increase.