> Except that they never actually asked the law if code can be law. They just...decided among themselves. And somehow expect the law to follow along. The premi

> Except that they never actually asked the law if code can be law. They just...decided among themselves. And somehow expect the law to follow along. The premier smart contract platform, when they had a bug in a popular dApp, summarily forked their chain to fix it. It's almost like the popular "code is not law, the law is the law" is not a serious point. If anything, in the "crypto industry", hacks are widely considered illegal (market manipulation like in this case, less so). The ecosystem however is purpose-built on pseudonymous bearer assets, so that the law can be the law, and the code can be fact.