Interesting. I am concerned, however, that those ceremonies would not be protected against sabotage. For instance, if a few participants decide not to follow th

Interesting. I am concerned, however, that those ceremonies would not be protected against sabotage. For instance, if a few participants decide not to follow the protocol, the ceremony would need to be restarted. A question then, would the dishonest parties could be identified? That can be used as a reason in the face of security to limit who could join and in that way, sabotage the ceremony. > An entire community could participate for their local votes and they could each destroy their own key in order to have confidence in the result. Two problems. Dishonest voters spoil the process. Synchronically running multiparty ceremony between all participants at the same time (what if the voter could not make it, what if the server gets a DDOS attack in the process).