2 ms·
It's not "intentionally weak authentication" – it's optionally weak authentication, so users can choose how hard it is to see their data. Something completely
by michokest 15y ago
It's not "intentionally weak authentication" – it's optionally weak authentication, so users can choose how hard it is to see their data.
Something completely different is securing sending out money
- zwischenzug 15y agoI think you've missed the point. It's not sufficient to let the user decide how much security they should have. It won't protect the banks from the expectations of security placed on them by others, however unreasonable that might seem.