5 ms·
Does any such academic study exist for any editor comparison? Since according to you these are "literally the job of people" and "standard UX research stuff".
by Aperocky 4y ago
Does any such academic study exist for any editor comparison? Since according to you these are "literally the job of people" and "standard UX research stuff".
This seems like a classic case of setting the bar arbitrarily high to stifle discussion - I cannot find any, but would love to be proven wrong.
- _Algernon_ 4y ago> Does any such academic study exist for any editor comparison? I don't know, you tell me. You're making the claim that one is superior. The burden of proof is on you.
- Aperocky 4y agoThe burden of proof is not infinite. Asking specifically to a level of proof that does not exist either way on a subject that does not pertains to such a level of proof is merely stifling discussion, not to mention that the claim that the editors are equal in capability are not immediately obvious and proof absolving.
- _Algernon_ 4y agoExpecting a single scientific study is not infinite burden of proof, in response to someone making a claim. It's the least to expect. Though it's convenient for you that you consider anything higher than your own standards "infinite".