4 ms·
What ruszki wrote was "where I come from, this notion is basically non-existent". It's ambiguous whether "this notion" refers to sex, gender, or the distinction
by fluoridation 4y ago
What ruszki wrote was "where I come from, this notion is basically non-existent". It's ambiguous whether "this notion" refers to sex, gender, or the distinction between the two, but since both sex and gender are human universals, you should have inferred that "this notion" referred to the distinction.
- moonchrome 4y agoHe literally wrote > Where I came from, this notion is basically non-existent. I meant sex.
- fluoridation 4y agoThose are two different and somewhat unrelated statements. First, "this notion" is unknown to them. Second, that they previously meant "sex". What does the second statement mean? Let's look at it in context: -I’ve never heard anybody who thought that there was no differences in women and men behaviours on average. -those differences you pointed out being connected to gender, are actually due to the sex of the individual, not due to the gender an individual chooses to identify with -Where I came from, this notion is basically non-existent. I meant sex. ruszki's comment expressed more verbosely would be: > This idea that sex and gender are distinguishable does not exist where I come from. Previously when I said "women and men" I was referring to the sexes, not to the genders. That is to say, to me "man" and "human male" are synonymous, as are "woman" and "human female". You had all the information necessary to interpret what was written charitable, but instead for some reason you decided to interpret it as if they were saying something nonsensical.