3 ms·
This should be the norm everywhere assuming non-landowners are fewer than landowners shouldn’t it? Failure to have freedom to roam/freedom of access either mean
by alkonaut 4y ago
This should be the norm everywhere assuming non-landowners are fewer than landowners shouldn’t it? Failure to have freedom to roam/freedom of access either means a lapse in democracy (wildly popular thing never politically proposed for some reason) or some weird constitutional quirk making it hard to legislate.
- alistairSH 4y agoDo you mean the opposite? In Scotland, something like 400 people own 50% of the land. 16 of them own 10% of the total land area.
- alkonaut 4y agoYes - too late to edit that one lol.