And they make value judgements on the results they don't seem to like: "The biggest correlation we found between gender and any one personality trait was r=0.4

And they make value judgements on the results they don't seem to like: "The biggest correlation we found between gender and any one personality trait was r=0.42, which means that gender explains 18% of the variability in that trait. Another way to put this is... if you knew a random person's score on that one personality trait, and you tried to guess that person's gender using just that score, you'd mispredict that person's gender 31% of the time!" They think that's low! That's crazy high for just one trait, it would be called "Highly significant" in any paper.