> MWI is equivalent to a simpler interpretation that doesn’t require split universes. That simpler interpretation is also equivalent to a simpler implementatio

> MWI is equivalent to a simpler interpretation that doesn’t require split universes. That simpler interpretation is also equivalent to a simpler implementation that doesn’t require apparently-arbitrary resolutions of quantum probabilities (MWI). It’s essentially a question of where you hide the “weird”. It seems likely to me that they’re both wrong, and the in-principle-untestability of all this points to our mental machinery just failing to map intuitive concepts onto this space, but I’m totally agnostic to this. I do find MWI more conceptually appealing.