5 ms·
> no executive orders or legal threats were issued. that is a pretty interesting high bar to uphold > No idea, but I am fairly certain that Biden can't appoin
by flavius29663 4y ago
> no executive orders or legal threats were issued.
that is a pretty interesting high bar to uphold
> No idea, but I am fairly certain that Biden can't appoint people as board members to companies he does not own.
That was an open and shut case of corruption, you playing innocent ("no idea") does not make it less so.
> Umm, I take it you took issue with Ivanka's positions and the 2 billion $ deals with the Saudis, yes? I am just asking questions here to make sure you are consistent. Also, unlike Ivanka and co(-conspirators), he was __NEVER__ appointed to an official position in the US government.
This is literally whataboutism. In the meantime, twitter did not remove information about Ivanka and the Trumps, on the contrary.
In an alternate reality, wouldn't you be pissed if Google removed all bad information about the Trumps?