>This is, in fancy language and snowed under by enumeration of historical research, math and science, an argument that "computers can never have a soul". Yep.

>This is, in fancy language and snowed under by enumeration of historical research, math and science, an argument that "computers can never have a soul". Yep. It is amazing to me how often this argument is presented by people who seem, and probably imagine themselves to be, rational. It's always disguised under several layers of definitions so that the key argument -- that humans are magic -- is obscured.