2 ms·
I firmly believe that if every fucker designing those standards had to provide 2 different reference implementations (say 2 different languages so idiosyncrasie
by ilyt 4y ago
I firmly believe that if every fucker designing those standards had to provide 2 different reference implementations (say 2 different languages so idiosyncrasies don't leak into design) plus full test suite for every feature we'd be with far simpler and better working standards, coz maybe someone will realize "fuck, this is hard to implement right, maybe we should rethink it?"
Instead it's yet another standard that looks like someone that fell out of the ivory tower outhouse.
- wizzwizz4 4y ago> say 2 different languages so idiosyncrasies don't leak into design Preferably, two different idiosyncratic languages. I vote Prolog and Snap! (BYOB). If you pick C and D, you'll get basically the same idiosyncrasies leaking in from both languages.