4 ms·
Let’s hope these fuckers are stupid enough to post on social media. The punishment should be 10 years, not 6 months.
by remote_phone 4y ago
Let’s hope these fuckers are stupid enough to post on social media. The punishment should be 10 years, not 6 months.
- katzgrau 4y agoEh, maybe that's taking it all a little too seriously. For all we know, the original art was the work of some ancient hooligans.
- remote_phone 4y agoWe don’t have very much evidence of ancient human art work around the world. Each one of them is precious. To make it morally equivalent to graffiti is ridiculous.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- slim 4y agois it more precious than one human life ?
- remote_phone 4y agoIt’s definitely more precious than the life of a scumbag that spent considerable effort getting through security measures just to destroy this thing.
- TheHappyOddish 4y agoThank goodness you're not in charge of the justice system.
- musingsole 4y agoRight, it's not like there are living stewards of the art who could've told you what it meant! Oh wait...
- sacrosancty 4y agoDraconian punishments aren't a good way to protect ancient relics. It only takes one person to not even know what the site is, let alone the punishment, to ruin it forever. Also, it's cruel read-a-news-story desire for vengeance for damaging something you probably never even knew existed in the first place.
- postalrat 4y agoAh the old ignorance defense.
- freedomben 4y ago10 years of a person's life for a (really stupid) childish mistake? And of course when they get out of prison there will be serious career impact that will last their entire lives. What they did is horrifying, but barbarism can't be the right answer.
- musingsole 4y agoBypassing security of the type described and being oblivious to why the security is there requires a type of autonomy and narcissism that exceeds "childish mistake".
- willcipriano 4y agoEveryone is tough on crime when they are personally offended.