2 ms·
Maybe I am not a great cook (I thought I was decent though) but these recipes look totally plausible and normal, even if not the best recipe you’ve ever seen. T
by hammock 4y ago
Maybe I am not a great cook (I thought I was decent though) but these recipes look totally plausible and normal, even if not the best recipe you’ve ever seen. They don’t look like gibberish markov chains to me. The ingredients are prepared appropriately
(I know a farfalle bun is a non sequitur but that was given as input- not provided by ChatGPT)
- colechristensen 4y agoIf you gave the name to the chef they’d wonder wtf somebody was doing mixing pasta and bone marrow and putting it in a bun. Putting pasta into a sandwich makes slightly more sense than making a bun out of a specific pasta shape and I guess that’s missing from the model, but really it did a decent enough job here. I don’t know when we’ll be at a place where if you ask a model for something and it comes back and tells you no and why that’s a dumb suggestion.
- hammock 4y agoThere’s no pasta in the ChatGPT recipe, it’s a “farfalle bun” (which we can assume is some type of pasta-inspired bun) with marrow in it. There is no pasta separate from the bun which gets put in the bun
- fasthands9 4y agoThey may be individually prepared appropriately but that is just because it copies other recipe texts. Perhaps it could be used to generate new ideas but so could a random recipe generator that picks three different cocktail ingredients and tells you to mix them. I'm not sure how this is any different than that, other than presentation. Presumably actual recipes you see in a cookbook written by a person have been made in real life and the person could vouch for their quality or ease of making.
- hammock 4y ago>it copies other recipe texts. What human made recipe doesn’t?