3 ms·

One of the more tangible outcomes from my work on mobile sync is the United scheduling software. Seems like Southwest was too little too late on IT upgrades. ht

• apelapan 4y ago
  How is Couchbase in general and the mobile sync in particular relevant to United not having this disaster right now? I've worked with airline scheduling software at almost the scale of United (about half the size, for the largest customer). That was using an Oracle database, which was a bit of a pain and a big expense, but worked fine as long as there was competent admins and competent devs. Would Couchbase be disaster-proof even when run by clowns? Not saying there aren't better and worse choices for databases in any given situation. Just saying that there are lots of them that work perfectly well in competent hands.
  • jchanimal 4y ago
    Architecture advantages over the phone based system described upthread are obvious. The reason United chose Couchbase is because it’s designed for offline updates. So if a plane, phone, or airport is disconnected they can still do the data entry work and reconcile asynchronously.
    • apelapan 4y ago
      But the Southwest system is not "phone-based" by design, I presume? They are going via phone because the decision support system for ops/crew control are down/unusable? If they've resorted to doing all their scheduling manually with pen and paper, any data pushed to the edge (air crews, ground staff etc) will need to be transmitted in a similarly manual fashion. The gate/ground/air crews are not making autonomous decisions about who is flying what, when and where. That is decided by some ops/crew control structure in the airline.