> I got the right to secure my sh*t I don't know if you've noticed, but the Supreme Court routinely flouts long-held interpretations of statute for nakedly ide

> I got the right to secure my sh*t I don't know if you've noticed, but the Supreme Court routinely flouts long-held interpretations of statute for nakedly ideological reasons. Rights don't mean anything if the government isn't willing to grant them, unfortunately. I would not bet on this court preserving a right to encryption as you describe it.