Since it wasn't clear, I was responding to this part of their comment: > She had 15 years of saving 26% of $250k to only have $250k??? Yikes. Which was a gros

Since it wasn't clear, I was responding to this part of their comment: > She had 15 years of saving 26% of $250k to only have $250k??? Yikes. Which was a gross misinterpretation of the text they had just quoted. Yes, it's bananas that making that much she only had $250k in savings for retirement. But that's not what I was responding to. She did not save 26% of $250k for a decade and only end up with $250k in savings.