3 ms·
If we can make it harder to run a scam call business by changing things on our end, and these changes do not impede non-fraudulent use, why not go for it? I do
by DiggyJohnson 4y ago
If we can make it harder to run a scam call business by changing things on our end, and these changes do not impede non-fraudulent use, why not go for it?
I don’t see why you’re pushing so hard against this line of reasoning, I guess. You’re making it sound like a hopeless endeavor to even try, in a “don’t lock your doors because thieves will just use lock picks” kind of way.
- bbbbb5 4y ago> If we can make it harder to run a scam call business by changing things on our end How much harder? If your changes increase the telephony costs of a scam call centre from 0.001% of revenue to 0.002%, you have not actually made their operations harder. > and these changes do not impede non-fraudulent use, why not go for it? Because these changes would not be free.