>people using public land apparently don't always stay on public land Yes that is one of the bad reasons. Put up "private property" posts or similar. If you ha

>people using public land apparently don't always stay on public land Yes that is one of the bad reasons. Put up "private property" posts or similar. If you have such an enormous plot of private land that you cannot manage to enforce a stranger sticking their toe out onto it, and you for some reason really need to enforce to that extent-- that is on you. Consider scaling down your private property. As for hunting on private property, that seems to a separate issue from the concept of landlocked public land. That's practically a guns issue. Anyway, that doesn't give private property owners dominion over public land. In fact, I didn't read of a single good reason.