3 ms·
I'd be very nervous if I was Cloudflare. They pretty explicitly say that the cookies are not strictly necessary for using the websites. > cookies are strictly
by tomp 4y ago
I'd be very nervous if I was Cloudflare. They pretty explicitly say that the cookies are not strictly necessary for using the websites.
> cookies are strictly necessary to provide the services requested by our customers
Cloudflare's customers are websites, not users, whereas the latter are protected by Cookie Law / GDPR.
That's exactly why Microsoft was fined (according to [1]):
> Microsoft argued that detecting ad fraud was "strictly necessary" for running bing.com, but the court disagreed, saying that advertising is not a service requested by the user. (point 53 in the full decision).
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34096210 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34096210
- johndhi 4y agoNah, Cloudflare is on pretty solid ground. The data protection authorities' guidance is explicit that load balancing and security-related services are safely considered strictly necessary for websites.