This sounds like empty moralizing. Someone somewhere should do things I think are "good" not things I think are "bad" because "we" need "good" things. And "good

This sounds like empty moralizing. Someone somewhere should do things I think are "good" not things I think are "bad" because "we" need "good" things. And "good" things are easy to objectively identify like <list>. > If technology itself were like a stock portfolio (to a degree it is), what we are building is heavily skewed to junk status. Posit a distribution, while providing no measure.