> Ask yourself, who told you Russia has invaded Ukraine? Rapidly changing events aren’t a great example. > Given it's synthetic, there may not be a specific l

> Ask yourself, who told you Russia has invaded Ukraine? Rapidly changing events aren’t a great example. > Given it's synthetic, there may not be a specific location the information came from. For bits of sufficiently commonly known information, sure. But if GPT quotes an exact or close enough snippet to something somebody written, and/or part of the topic has been mostly covered in depth by one or two authors, they can be attributed. (Not very unlike a human mind would do it.) I can’t see how attribution is that red line beyond which lies something unattainable by LLM. > What they'd end up having to do is the very human act of "googling" for sources that agree with what they already believe. Which is not the same. Not sure I got this part in the context…