2 ms·
I do not believe that is the case at all. I believe I have a rational, sane approach to the commission of crimes against humanity, whereas your view seeks to j
by aa-jv 4y ago
I do not believe that is the case at all. I believe I have a rational, sane approach to the commission of crimes against humanity, whereas your view seeks to justify those crimes - which can only be done under conditions of extreme delusion.
"Therefore, the assertion that the data of the whole afghan population is readily accessible seems somewhat exaggerated"
No, this is not correct. The assertion that the data of the whole afghan population is readily accessible is not negated by the 'mere' existence of 'only two devices'. These two facts are not related.
The truth is this:
1. The entire Afghan populations' biometric data was captured and is now in the hands of a totalitarian-authoritarian body that will actually use it to murder people.
2. This biometric data has started to leak - for example, the two devices easily obtained by CCC hackers.
3. It can be asserted with confidence that further leaks are possible.
None of this justifies the capture of human biometric data.
- theCrowing 4y agoYour comments are anything but rational and I am not disregarding the fact that alone the existence of two unwiped devices is absolutely repulsive. I am just arguing for a factual discussion and the actual representation of the information at hand instead of making assumptions and insinuations like you do. The only thing that will come from being dishonest and passive aggressive is that no one will take you seriously.
- aa-jv 4y agoPlease examine your use of vitriol. It may reveal an aspect of this argument you have not fully considered.